BY ADA LIMÓN
The truth is, I’ve never cared for the National
Anthem. If you think about it, it’s not a good
song. Too high for most of us with “the rockets
By saying it's "too high", Limón is commenting on the composition of the actual song rather than the content or meaning behind it.
red glare” and then there are the bombs.
(Always, always, there is war and bombs.)
However she then follows that by going into the multiple negative connotations behind the song, beginning with bombs, which she comments on the prevalence of violence and normalization of it in regard to this country.
Once, I sang it at homecoming and threw
even the tenacious high school band off key.
To break up the "darker" commentary, Limón throws in a personal anecdote to lighten the mood just a bit to then connect to later points.
But the song didn’t mean anything, just a call
to the field, something to get through before
the pummeling of youth. And what of the stanzas
She then again connects to the first lines of the poem, showing how many people overlook the meaning of the National Anthem, and simply just sing it because it's tradition.
we never sing, the third that mentions “no refuge
could save the hireling and the slave”? Perhaps,
Here, Limón begins her opinion against the National Anthem, and begins to pull information that is commonly brushed over by most of the nation.
the truth is, every song of this country
has an unsung third stanza, something brutal
The connection to poetry within poetry is really significant to me, and it almost helps the concept come across easier because it's relating to a medium that is already known.
snaking underneath us as we blindly sing
the high notes with a beer sloshing in the stands
hoping our team wins. Don’t get me wrong, I do
These lines were very noteworthy to me because it connects back to the previously used anecdote of when the National Anthem is sung. Those singing it with "beers in hand" are so blissfully ignorant to the true meaning behind the song they're singing with cheer and celebration.
like the flag, how it undulates in the wind
like water, elemental, and best when it’s humbled,
brought to its knees, clung to by someone who
has lost everything, when it’s not a weapon,
Limón describes the beauty of the flag, and how it's physically beautiful, but what it represents is not necessarily beautiful as well.
when it flickers, when it folds up so perfectly
you can keep it until it’s needed, until you can
love it again, until the song in your mouth feels
like sustenance, a song where the notes are sung
Following the last section of lines, the flag is beautiful when it's used not as a representation of the country's negativity, but when it represents the positives and freedoms of the country.
by even the ageless woods, the short-grass plains,
the Red River Gorge, the fistful of land left
unpoisoned, that song that’s our birthright,
Going back to the country's roots before it was "tampered with", the flag to Limón represents the beauty of the life and society that was around before large corporations and capitalism took over. She views the country and society we live in now to have "poisoned" the beautiful natural world that this country built itself on top of.
that’s sung in silence when it’s too hard to go on,
that sounds like someone’s rough fingers weaving
into another’s, that sounds like a match being lit
in an endless cave, the song that says my bones
are your bones, and your bones are my bones,
and isn’t that enough?
Limón begins the poem in a very literal way, relating the National Anthem to personal anecdotes that many can relate to, and then ends the poem here in a very abstract way, but still related everything back to the collective nature of humanity. At the end of the day, everyone is the same built with the same bones, and that should be enough to rejoice and celebrate rather than a song that represents a time in the nation that many choose to "forget".
I chose this poet specifically because I love how all of her pieces comment/criticize society, as well as gender, race, and mental health. This poem specifically appeals to me because of how it's politically driven but yet doesn't include much explicit opinion, just facts based from observation. I agree with everything written about in this poem that society tends to try and overlook the negative parts of history, when in reality they need to be discussed so we can learn from the past and see growth and progress. The history of certain groups of people should not be looked over simply because it is "embarrassing" for the nation. #teachlivingpoets

Comments
Post a Comment